<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Kitces | Nerd's Eye View - MailBag</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Commentary on financial planning news and developments</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.5 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>MailBag: How To Get Started On Twitter As A Busy Financial Planner</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/511-MailBag-How-To-Get-Started-On-Twitter-As-A-Busy-Financial-Planner.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/511-MailBag-How-To-Get-Started-On-Twitter-As-A-Busy-Financial-Planner.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=511</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=511</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s MailBag, we look at a question about how to get started using Twitter (and other social media) as a busy financial planner. What are the tools for efficiency, and what are the tips and tricks to get started easily?&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/511-MailBag-How-To-Get-Started-On-Twitter-As-A-Busy-Financial-Planner.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: How To Get Started On Twitter As A Busy Financial Planner&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:03:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/511-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: The Impact Of The Phaseout Of Itemized Deductions (Pease Limitation) On AMT Exposure</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/483-MailBag-The-Impact-Of-The-Phaseout-Of-Itemized-Deductions-Pease-Limitation-On-AMT-Exposure.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/483-MailBag-The-Impact-Of-The-Phaseout-Of-Itemized-Deductions-Pease-Limitation-On-AMT-Exposure.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=483</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=483</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s MailBag, we look at a question about the interplay between the phaseout of itemized deductions for high income individuals (the so-called &amp;quot;Pease limitation&amp;quot;) and potential exposure to the AMT.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/483-MailBag-The-Impact-Of-The-Phaseout-Of-Itemized-Deductions-Pease-Limitation-On-AMT-Exposure.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: The Impact Of The Phaseout Of Itemized Deductions (Pease Limitation) On AMT Exposure&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 06:04:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/483-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: Is A Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) From An IRA Better Than Donating Appreciated Securities?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/474-MailBag-Is-A-Qualified-Charitable-Distribution-QCD-From-An-IRA-Better-Than-Donating-Appreciated-Securities.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/474-MailBag-Is-A-Qualified-Charitable-Distribution-QCD-From-An-IRA-Better-Than-Donating-Appreciated-Securities.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=474</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=474</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s MailBag, we look at a recent inquiry regarding whether it&#039;s still a good deal to donate appreciated securities to a charity, now that the rules are back allowing Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs) directly from an IRA to a charity.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/474-MailBag-Is-A-Qualified-Charitable-Distribution-QCD-From-An-IRA-Better-Than-Donating-Appreciated-Securities.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: Is A Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) From An IRA Better Than Donating Appreciated Securities?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 06:10:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/474-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: What Are The Implications Of A Uniform Fiduciary Standard To Advisors And Consumers?</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/471-MailBag-What-Are-The-Implications-Of-A-Uniform-Fiduciary-Standard-To-Advisors-And-Consumers.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/471-MailBag-What-Are-The-Implications-Of-A-Uniform-Fiduciary-Standard-To-Advisors-And-Consumers.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=471</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=471</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s MailBag, we look at a recent inquiry regarding the proposed changes to the fiduciary standard, and whether the implementation of a uniform fiduciary standard that applies equally to all types of advisors could help or hurt investment advisers and the public.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/471-MailBag-What-Are-The-Implications-Of-A-Uniform-Fiduciary-Standard-To-Advisors-And-Consumers.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: What Are The Implications Of A Uniform Fiduciary Standard To Advisors And Consumers?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/471-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: 0.9% Medicare Tax Withholding From Nonqualified Deferred Compensation And Separating Twitter Accounts For Personal And Business Use</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/452-MailBag-0.9%25-Medicare-Tax-Withholding-From-Nonqualified-Deferred-Compensation-And-Separating-Twitter-Accounts-For-Personal-And-Business-Use.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/452-MailBag-0.9%25-Medicare-Tax-Withholding-From-Nonqualified-Deferred-Compensation-And-Separating-Twitter-Accounts-For-Personal-And-Business-Use.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=452</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=452</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s mailbag, we look at two recent inquiries: 1) what is the treatment of nonqualified deferred compensation for the purposes of the new 0.9% Medicare earned income tax starting in 2013; and 2) should you have separate Twitter accounts for your advisory firm and yourself personally, or just do everything personal and business from one account?&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/452-MailBag-0.9%25-Medicare-Tax-Withholding-From-Nonqualified-Deferred-Compensation-And-Separating-Twitter-Accounts-For-Personal-And-Business-Use.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: 0.9% Medicare Tax Withholding From Nonqualified Deferred Compensation And Separating Twitter Accounts For Personal And Business Use&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:04:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/452-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: Hostess Pension Shortfall And The PBGC, And The Cost Basis And Tax Treatment Of MLPs</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/448-MailBag-Hostess-Pension-Shortfall-And-The-PBGC,-And-The-Cost-Basis-And-Tax-Treatment-Of-MLPs.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/448-MailBag-Hostess-Pension-Shortfall-And-The-PBGC,-And-The-Cost-Basis-And-Tax-Treatment-Of-MLPs.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=448</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=448</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s mailbag, we look at two recent inquiries: 1) was there anything illegal in what Hostess did in stopping its pension plan contributions and leaving a huge shortfall, and how shaky is the PBGC; and&amp;#160;2) how do you calculate cost basis for a Master Limited Partnership (MLP) as distributions are received, and what is the tax treatment of gains when the MLP is later sold?&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/448-MailBag-Hostess-Pension-Shortfall-And-The-PBGC,-And-The-Cost-Basis-And-Tax-Treatment-Of-MLPs.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: Hostess Pension Shortfall And The PBGC, And The Cost Basis And Tax Treatment Of MLPs&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:06:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/448-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: Solo 401(k) Contributions For S Corps And End-Of-Year Rebalancing To Harvest Capital Gains</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/445-MailBag-Solo-401k-Contributions-For-S-Corps-And-End-Of-Year-Rebalancing-To-Harvest-Capital-Gains.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/445-MailBag-Solo-401k-Contributions-For-S-Corps-And-End-Of-Year-Rebalancing-To-Harvest-Capital-Gains.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=445</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=445</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s mailbag, we look at two recent inquiries: 1) when do employee &amp;quot;salary deferral&amp;quot; contributions have to be made for a solo 401(k) where the business is an S corporation; and&amp;#160;2) is it a good idea to split end-of-year rebalancing trades to trigger the gains this year but the losses next year (even if it means you&#039;re out of the markets for a few days).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/445-MailBag-Solo-401k-Contributions-For-S-Corps-And-End-Of-Year-Rebalancing-To-Harvest-Capital-Gains.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: Solo 401(k) Contributions For S Corps And End-Of-Year Rebalancing To Harvest Capital Gains&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:34:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/445-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: Roth IRA Conversions With Higher Tax Rates And Hybrid Life/LTC Insurance Policies</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/427-MailBag-Roth-IRA-Conversions-With-Higher-Tax-Rates-And-Hybrid-LifeLTC-Insurance-Policies.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/427-MailBag-Roth-IRA-Conversions-With-Higher-Tax-Rates-And-Hybrid-LifeLTC-Insurance-Policies.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=427</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=427</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; 
&lt;div&gt;In this week&#039;s mailbag, we look at two recent inquiries: 1) whether or not it&#039;s a good plan to do a significant Roth IRA conversion if your client has a high conviction that tax rates are going up in the future (and/or what the downside risks of the strategy are); and 2) what is and isn&#039;t guaranteed if you purchase one of the new hybrid life/LTC insurance policies, and the potential risks of owning such policies.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/427-MailBag-Roth-IRA-Conversions-With-Higher-Tax-Rates-And-Hybrid-LifeLTC-Insurance-Policies.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: Roth IRA Conversions With Higher Tax Rates And Hybrid Life/LTC Insurance Policies&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/427-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>MailBag: Problems With RMD Method For Retirement Income And 1031 Exchanges To Avoid New Medicare 3.8% Tax</title>
    <link>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/426-MailBag-Problems-With-RMD-Method-For-Retirement-Income-And-1031-Exchanges-To-Avoid-New-Medicare-3.8%25-Tax.html</link>
            <category>MailBag</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/426-MailBag-Problems-With-RMD-Method-For-Retirement-Income-And-1031-Exchanges-To-Avoid-New-Medicare-3.8%25-Tax.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.kitces.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=426</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.kitces.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=426</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Michael Kitces)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;Many readers of this blog contact me directly with questions and comments. While often the responses are very specific to a particular circumstance, occasionally the subject matter is general enough that it might be of interest to others as well. Accordingly, I will occasionally post a new &amp;quot;MailBag&amp;quot; article, presenting the question or comment (on a strictly anonymous basis!) and my response, in the hopes that the discussion may be useful food for thought.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;In this week&#039;s mailbag, we look at two recent inquiries: 1) whether or not it&#039;s a good deal to use 1031 real estate exchanges to avoid the new 3.8% Medicare surtax on investment income that begins in 2013; and 2) some thoughts on the recent Center for Retirement Research brief about using the RMD method as a retirement income/withdrawal strategy.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/426-MailBag-Problems-With-RMD-Method-For-Retirement-Income-And-1031-Exchanges-To-Avoid-New-Medicare-3.8%25-Tax.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;MailBag: Problems With RMD Method For Retirement Income And 1031 Exchanges To Avoid New Medicare 3.8% Tax&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:03:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kitces.com/blog/archives/426-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>