Search results for: "FP+Careers"

In recent years, the financial planning profession has seen a growing shift in the services that financial advisors offer to their clients. Whereas in the earliest years of the profession, advisors primarily provided clients with product-based offerings such as insurance, annuity, and investment products, the focus of many advisors today has shifted to service-based offerings around the ‘advice’ itself.  Interestingly, though, the shift to service-based advice offerings continues to expand, past the ‘traditional’ realms of financial planning advice, as now more and more financial advisors find themselves playing the role of a financial “life coach” to their clients, focusing more on how their clients can develop their goals and establish the financial capacity to realize their dreams (and not ‘just’ recommending the products they’ll implement to get there), and going along with them on the journey to navigate the inevitable shifts and changes that come along the way.

In this guest post, Roger Whitney – Senior Financial Advisor of The Retirement Answer Man, and creator of his “Agile Retirement Management®” process – describes a new financial planning paradigm he calls “Agile Financial Planning” for advisors who want to help clients achieve their financial goals, versus simply creating a one-time financial plan for them. This new model is based on the Agile Manifesto developed in 2001 by a group of software engineers inspired to improve upon the rigid, process-driven “waterfall” style of project management traditionally popular at the time (and that continues to be used effectively today by large corporate businesses). The Agile approach is based on four primary values: 1) individuals and interactions over processes and tools, 2) working software over comprehensive documentation, 3) customer collaboration over contract negotiation, and 4) responding to change over following a plan.

Adapting the tenets of the original Agile Manifesto, Roger developed his own “Agile Financial Planning®” approach, a financial planning process focused on the same objectives of continuous improvement, team input, and a quality (advice) product, with five core principles aimed to help advisors create a high standard for client care: 1) Acceptance that uncertainty is natural and will/should create a need to update strategies for achieving goals; 2) Collaboration between advisors (with financial planning expertise) and clients (with expertise around what makes the most sense for their own lives and situations) in creating a plan will produce more successful results than if the advisor just creates the plan for the client themselves; 3) Flexibility allows for creatively responding to changes in the plan with effective solutions, 4) Prioritizing goals and resources around what’s most important and impactful (versus what might be most attractive but is actually just distracting) will lead to improvement in everyone’s life; and 5) Communication on a continual basis will keep the process moving forward and in alignment with the Agile Financial Plan, providing opportunities to accept and respond to uncertainties as they arise, collaborate, stay flexible, and prioritize.

The Agile Financial Planning process consists of four stages: 1) Feasibility (creating a high-level plan to prioritize clients’ most important goals); 2) Sustainability (analyzing resources to develop resiliency in the plan against market forces and life circumstances); 3) Optimization (choosing the strategies to implement to make the best use of resources when executing the plan); and 4) Iteration (staying in touch with clients to ensure they remain engaged in the process, and keep moving forward with goal-setting and implementation). In turn, clients move through these stages with frequent meetings that Roger refers to as “huddles” and “SMART sprints”. In this context, huddles are brief conversations that take place frequently, and serve to keep the advisor and client in touch with each other, in between the goal-setting SMART sprints – the strategy discussions that help the client determine their next SMART (Sustainable, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, and Time-Bound) goal to prioritize and then “sprint” to implement. Because Agile Financial Planning is a never-ending project that focuses on managing change.

Ultimately, the key point is that an Agile-style financial planning approach offers a process for financial planners who have chosen to go beyond ‘traditional’ financial planning practices that rely on long, comprehensive, data-gathering meetings upfront, to develop a one-time financial plan that is not frequently (if ever) updated.  Instead, Agile Financial Planners coach clients on developing multiple SMART goals over time, discussed through frequent huddles designed to keep clients both on track and, more importantly, engaged.  Even though the advisor is responsible for managing the process, the process still depends on a dynamic, interactive relationship with participation by both advisor and client, relying on the advisor’s financial planning expertise, and the client’s intimate understanding of their own goals, abilities, and circumstances.

Read More...

In the early days of being a “financial advisor” at a broker-dealer or insurance company, having ’expertise’ meant being well-trained on the company’s products and their features and benefits. ‘Training’ at large financial services firms was primarily focused on product training (and perhaps training in how to sell those products), with the benefit that when the scope of required knowledge is fairly understood – just the features of a handful of the company’s most popular best-selling products – it takes relatively little time to train in the first place. In other words, training up an advisor’s expertise was rather simple and speedy, because the advisor just had to master the inner workings of a few select products.

In the modern era, though, as financial advice is increasingly comprehensive and holistic, the breadth of what it takes to have ‘expertise’ goes far beyond what was required in the product-centric world of 20 years ago. Yet unfortunately, the reality is that the minimum bar to become a “financial advisor” – generally, a Series 6 and 63, 7 and 66, or a Series 65 exam – is largely unchanged through this shift, built around 3 hours of regulatory exams that most can study for and pass in just a few weeks. The end result is that ‘advisors’ are licensed to provide comprehensive financial advice, with no actual requirement to have any training, education, or experience, in personal finance or advice itself.

On the one hand, a voluntary desire to improve financial planning expertise has led to rapid growth of CFP certification in recent years, with more than 5,000 CFP candidates completing the exam process in 2018, up from approximately 3,000 in 2013. Still, though, the total penetration of CFP certification is still less than 86,000 out of approximately 311,000 financial advisors (or barely more than 25%). Which makes it incredibly difficult to deliver financial planning advice efficiently… when the advisor has to research any and every question the client asks, because they lack the depth of expertise to actually know those answers offhand in the first place.

In fact, recent Kitces research on “How Financial Advisors Actually Do Financial Planning” finds an emerging “Experience-Expertise” gap, where having CFP certification reduces the time it takes to complete the first-year financial planning process by 22%, and that amongst the most experienced advisors, having CFP certification reduces the time of the financial planning process by a whopping 44%. As the more experienced the financial advisor, the more confident they tend to be, and the more affluent and complex clientele they tend to attract… which means advisors with more experience actually end out spending even more time to get through the financial planning process (despite the availability of technology, and their years or decades of experience doing it!).

Similarly, more experienced financial advisors also tend to increasingly struggle with the time efficiency of financial planning, because an increasingly complex range of clientele means an ever-widening range of complex situations that the advisor must provide advice on. Notably, though, the real challenge isn’t that more experienced advisors tend to have more sophisticated clientele with more complex needs, but that their needs are differently complex. Which means formulating a niche or more specialized expertise for a particular target clientele can not only be effective for marketing purposes, but also becomes a substantial efficiency improvement, as once the advisor researches and ’learns’ how to handle a particular complex situation, it becomes repeatable expertise for the future as well.

In addition, crafting a more repeatable financial planning process also makes it possible to improve the efficiency of financial planning by leveraging paraplanners who can do not only a portion of the back-office work in financial planning preparation, but even limited-scope portions of the financial planning meeting process as well. Such that, in practice, solo advisors who leverage a paraplanner are able to service an average of 64% more clients and generate 80% more take-home pay by better aligning the tasks being done to the skill and experience (and compensation) level of the team member.

The bottom line, though, is simply to recognize that the majority of the time spent in the financial planning process isn’t actually in the phases of Analyzing and Developing the financial planning recommendations themselves, but also in Establishing the relationship, Gathering data, Presenting the plan, Implementing it, and the ongoing Monitoring process (and the never-ending stream of financial planning questions that crop up from clients along the way). Most of which are human-to-human interactions and communication (either in-person, by video, or via email)… which means the key to improving their efficiency is not necessarily investing in the technology to better automate those processes, but instead investing into the human capital of advisors themselves with deeper and more focused expertise, and a wider range of skill levels to which various financial planning tasks throughout the process can be appropriately (and cost-effectively) matched.

Read More...