Kitces.com - Advancing Knowledge in Financial Planning

Weekend Reading for Financial Planners (Feb 9-10)

February 8, 2019 02:53 pm 0 Comments CATEGORY: Weekend Reading

Enjoy the current installment of "weekend reading for financial planners" – this week's edition kicks off with the news that state legislators are taking action yet again to fill the fiduciary void left by vacating the DoL fiduciary rule and the SEC's non-fiduciary Best Interest Regulation... this time, from Maryland, which has proposed a new fiduciary rule that would uniformly apply to RIAs, brokers, and insurance agents, and setting off the usual objections from industry product manufacturers that a state patchwork of fiduciary rules will create an unnecessarily high burden of regulatory complexity (albeit while the industry also continues to fight against fiduciary regulation at the Federal level, too!).

Also in the news this week is coverage of the recent TD Ameritrade LINC National conference where CEO Tim Hockey vowed not to compete with the RIAs on its platform (as the issue of RIA custodians with retail divisions competing against their own RIAs becomes an increasingly sensitive issue), a new diversity push at Edward Jones to steer retiring advisors' books of clients to advisors who are women and people of color that some are claiming goes "too far" by paying advisors more to hand off clients to minorities (and less to transition their clients to another white male), the news that within 2 weeks of Bogle's death Vanguard removed its claims of being an "at-cost" and "no-profit" provider (though it's unclear if the firm is really changing its strategy, or simply backing off claims that were causing it legal troubles about whether its pricing was an inappropriate tax dodge), and a look at Fidelity's expansion of its model portfolios as advisors increasingly outsource investment model design and implementation (which asset managers like Fidelity are using as an opportunity to increase their own assets by offering pre-built models that "happen" to predominantly use their own proprietary funds).

From there, we have several articles on advisor technology, from a discussion of whether presentations on advisor technology should be eligible for CFP CE credit, highlights from the T3 advisor technology conference, how the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) will likely play out with advisors in the coming years (think less "robots replace advisors" and more "software that combs through data to identify planning opportunities for advisors to discuss with their clients"), and a review of the ongoing technology initiatives at all the major RIA custodians as a veritable "technology arms race" gets underway as platforms compete for advisors' attention.

We wrap up with three interesting articles, all around the theme of the changing landscape of the financial services industry itself: the first looks at the recent Royal Commission report in Australia, a highly critical review of their conflicted financial advisor landscape, and the rather drastic changes that the regulators may now implement to ensure advisors are truly acting in the best interests of their clients and not merely as salespeople for their company's products; the second is a fascinating exploration of the evolution of the financial services industry over the past 130 years, which finds that, despite exponential growth in technology efficiencies, the financial services industry all-in takes the same 1.5% to 2% of assets to facilitate investment now as they did more than a century ago (albeit while providing more value-adds for the same aggregate fee); and the last which looks at research on the true value that clients get from planning for their future finances, and how financial advisors, in particular, appear to provide the most value and best outcomes for at least those planning-oriented clients.

Enjoy the "light" reading!

How The New QBI Deduction-Reduction Ruins The Value Of Pre-Tax Retirement Plans For Small Business Owners

February 6, 2019 07:03 am 5 Comments CATEGORY: Taxes

In December 2017, Congress passed “comprehensive tax reform” via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The law was a once-in-a-generation, massive rewrite of the Tax Code, and gave birth to IRC Section 199A, which allows certain owners of pass-through businesses to receive a deduction for up to 20% of qualified business income.

While the new deduction will be a powerful way for many business owners to reduce their tax liability, it comes at a price… complexity. Many tax experts believe that “new” IRC Section 199A is among the most complicated aspects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. And as evidence to support that claim, individuals can look no further than the IRS’s massive dump of Section 199A guidance on January 18, 2019. That trove of 199A guidance included 247 pages of Final Regulations and discussion, additional Proposed Regulations, IRS Notice 2019-07, and IRS Revenue Procedure 2019-11!

Critically, the introduction of the Section 199A deduction means that business owners must reevaluate their planning from the ground up, as even “obvious” decisions may need to be altered in light of the new rules. Case in point? Going forward, the Section 199A deduction will dramatically reduce the value of a tax-deductible retirement plan contributions.

This new “deduction-reduction problem” with pre-tax retirement contributions arises from the fact that the Section 199A deduction only applies to qualified business income, which is essentially the profits of a company. But when an S corporation makes an employer contribution to an employer-sponsored retirement plan, that contribution, itself, reduces corporate profits. Thus, there is less profit on which the 199A deduction can potentially apply. The sum of these moving parts is that, for some S corporation owners, a contribution to an employer-sponsored retirement plan will effectively result in a partial deduction, but still subject the entire contribution, plus all future earnings, to income tax upon distribution.

Prior to the issuance of the Final Regulations, it was widely assumed that this issue was only applicable to owners of entities taxed as S corporations, since contributions to retirement plans for sole proprietors and partners do not reduce business profits, but rather, are taken as personal above-the-line deductions on new Form Schedule 1 (formerly on the bottom of page 1 of Form 1040). The Final Regulations, however, make clear that sole proprietors and partners must also “back out” these amounts from business profits prior to the application of the 199A deduction. Thus, the “deduction-reduction problem” created by the Section 199A deduction will impact far more small business owners than previously thought.

In general, the primary reason a business owner should make contributions to a tax-deductible retirement plan (as opposed to a Roth-style plan) is that they believe that they are in a higher tax bracket today than they will be when they distribute those funds (along with their earnings) in the future. But when, in effect, you’re only getting a partial deduction for amounts contributed to a plan today, but still have to pay taxes on the “full boat” in the future, it changes the calculus quite a bit! Notably, for business owners who find themselves in this situation, their future tax rate must be even lower for the tax-deductible contribution today to make sense.

But just because a business owner isn’t getting the same bang-for-the-buck on a tax-deductible contribution doesn’t mean that they should throw in the tax-preferred-retirement-savings towel altogether! Instead, 401(k)s with a Roth-style option will simply become more valuable. And for those business owners looking to sock away more for retirement than the $19,000 maximum Roth 401(k) deferral ($25,000 if 50+ by year-end) for 2019, making after-tax contributions to the 401(k) plan (potentially to later convert under the “Mega-Back-Door Roth” strategy) can be an increasingly attractive option as well.

Of course, there is no -one-size-fits-all solution, and there are still plenty of business owners who will continue to benefit from tax-deductible contributions. Such business owners include those in Specified Service Businesses whose income is so high that the QBI deduction is phased out anyway (such as high-income financial advisors, doctors, lawyers, consultants, and accountants), those who believe that their future marginal tax rate will be significantly lower than the marginal tax rate they face today, and business owners who need to reduce their Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) to qualify for other deductions, credits, etc. (as the Section 199A deduction happens “below-the-line” and itself does not reduce AGI).

And of course, it’s important to recognize that tax-favored retirement accounts, in general, should not be abandoned altogether in light of the deduction-reduction impact of Section 199A. While the new deduction-reduction limitation definitely tilts the balance more towards Roth-style retirement accounts, the tax-deferred nature of all retirement accounts cannot be overlooked. Thus, even getting a partial deduction on a contribution today, while paying income tax on the full amount (plus earnings) in the future, will often be preferable than simply investing the same amounts in a taxable account where the entire contribution is implicitly taxed immediately (as an after-tax-dollars account) and then experienced further annual “tax drag” from interest, dividends, and capital gains.

Ultimately though, the most important thing for business owners and their advisors to realize is that the Section 199A deduction’s complexities go far beyond just the calculation of the deduction itself. Rather, there are ripple effects that make it necessary to take a fresh look at every element of a business owner’s overall tax plan, including which type of retirement plans will really provide the maximum benefit in the future!

#FASuccess Ep 110: Adapting The 4-Hour Work Week Into A Highly Profitable 4-Month Work Year Lifestyle Practice, with Micah Shilanski

February 5, 2019 07:15 am 0 Comments CATEGORY: Financial Advisor Success Podcast

Welcome back to the 110th episode of Financial Advisor Success Podcast!

My guest on today's podcast is Micah Shilanski. Micah is a partner with Shilanski & Associates, an independent RIA in Anchorage, Alaska, where Micah personally oversees nearly $130 million of assets under management for almost 160 client households.

What's unique about Micah, though, is that over the past 8 years, he's transitioned from working 70-plus hour work weeks to refining his practice down to the point where he can service all 160 clients while being in the office for only 4 months of the year, an endeavor that he first started simply to get more efficient and better work/life balance, and then had to extend further out of necessity over the past several years to unfortunately support a sick child.

In this episode, we talk about how Micah manages his client workload of meeting processes to be able to sustain 160 clients while being in the office only 4 months of the year. How he boxed together a whopping six or seven client meetings a day for five-week surges in the spring and the fall, the way he handles meeting preparation and client notes in the midst of maintaining such an intensive client meeting schedule, how he sets a communication policy with clients during the onboarding process to set their expectations around his somewhat unusual schedule, and the way Micah overcame his own severe dyslexia to keep rigorous notes into CRM by using a combination of audio dictation tools and video emails to clients.

We also talk about how Micah has managed to not only maintain his practice but grow at 20% a year, despite only being in the office for 4 months, by focusing into a niche of helping federal employees with their retirement benefits. How he created his own niche website, plan-your-federal-retirement.com, to reach prospective clients, the seminar marketing strategy he uses to get even more clients into his niche, why he charges and can get a $500 initial consultation fee even for prospects that find him on the internet, and how by focusing into a niche, he's able to confidently charge above-average fees of $4,000 for an initial plan plus 1.75% of assets under management, because, as Micah emphasizes, there's nothing wrong with charging a premium fee when you genuinely offer specialized and premium service to a niche clientele who simply can't get the same expertise and experience anywhere else.

And be certain to listen to the end, where Micah shares the initial steps that any financial advisor can take to at least start to improve their own personal efficiency in the office, and how despite his time out of the office and the staff support he needs to make that happen, he's ultimately still been able to maintain his target of a nearly 70% EBOC take-home compensation from his $130 million AUM practice.

The Latest In Financial Advisor #FinTech (February 2019)

February 4, 2019 07:07 am 0 Comments CATEGORY: Technology & Advisor FinTech

Welcome to the February 2019 issue of the Latest News in Financial Advisor #FinTech – where we look at the big news, announcements, and underlying trends and developments that are emerging in the world of technology solutions for financial advisors and wealth management!

This month's edition kicks off with the big news that eMoney Advisor founder Edmond Walters is back, with a new financial planning software competitor… but one targeting an entirely different (ultra-high-net-worth) clientele than traditional financial planning tools, such that MoneyGuidePro and Envestnet (owner of FinanceLogix) have actually partnered with Walters’ new Apprise Labs to develop the solution (aptly named “MoneyLogixPro”).

From there, the latest highlights also include a number of interesting advisor technology announcements, including:

RightCapital raises a $3.7M Series A round to scale its competition with MoneyGuidePro, eMoney Advisor, and NaviPlan in the enterprise market
AdvicePay raises a $2M seed extension round by crowdfunding within the advisor community itself to power a new enterprise solution for hybrid broker-dealers offering fee-for-service financial planning
MoneyGuidePro rolls out its own new “downmarket” solution for non-CFPs dubbed MoneyGuideOne, and announces a new, more advanced financial planning software solution to be called MoneyGuideElite
Plaid acquires Quovo to turn its account aggregation services into more actionable APIs that might actually move client assets (or manage them from afar)

Read the analysis about these announcements in this month's column, and a discussion of more trends in advisor technology, including Bridge Financial’s new portfolio performance reporting solution for small-to-mid-sized RIAs, Timeline’s new retirement distribution software to model the impact of dynamic spending rules and dynamic asset allocation on sustainable withdrawal rates, the rollout of two new client survey/feedback tools to better measure client engagement, and a look at how the latest T3 Advisor Technology Survey shows that what advisors state is their most important technology is not what they actually spend the most on (raising the question of whether there’s room for higher-priced CRM and financial planning software, and coming price pressure on portfolio performance reporting tools).

And be certain to read to the end, where we have provided an update to our popular new “Financial Advisor FinTech Solutions Map” as well!

I hope you're continuing to find this new column on financial advisor technology to be helpful! Please share your comments at the end and let me know what you think!

*And for #AdvisorTech companies who want to submit their tech announcements for consideration in future issues, please submit to [email protected]!

Weekend Reading for Financial Planners (Feb 2-3)

February 1, 2019 02:58 pm 0 Comments CATEGORY: Weekend Reading

Enjoy the current installment of "weekend reading for financial planners" – this week's edition kicks off with the big industry news that eMoney Advisor founder Edmond Walters is "back", with a new high-end financial planning software to support tax, estate, and legacy planning conversations with ultra-high-net-worth clients... positioned not necessarily to compete with traditional financial planning software, but to go beyond it, as the offering is actually being developed in partnership with MoneyGuidePro and Envestnet's Logix planning software.

Also in the news this week is a great series of profiles on the leading "Women In WealthTech", as ThinkAdvisor highlights the rise of gender diversity in enterprise technology for financial advisors (even as the gender diversity of financial advisors ourselves continues to struggle).

From there, we have several articles on the (re-)emergence of fixed indexed annuities, as DPL Financial Partners facilitates the launch of a new no-commission fixed indexed annuity for the RIA channel, Roger Ibbotson publishes a study suggesting that indexed annuities may be a superior fixed income alternative to traditional bonds in a diversified portfolio, and Michael Edesess suggests that real-world annuity contracts may still be too expensive to beat bonds in practice (and for those who wish to pursue the strategies anyway, could accomplish even more by simply using options strategies themselves instead).

We also have a number of career and practice management articles this week, from tips on the first tasks to outsource to a virtual assistant as a solo financial advisor, more tips on how to make your advisory firm more attractive and compelling when hiring talent in the midst of a severe advisor talent shortage, even more tips on how to manage the overwhelm of meetings, and some fascinating insights from an advisor on what she wishes she learned in practice management sessions about running an advisory firm but instead had to learn "the hard way" instead.

We wrap up with three interesting articles, all around the theme of social media and email overwhelm and how to combat it, including: a recent study that analyzed the effects of taking a 1-month break from Facebook and how it not only created more free time (obviously, from the freed up Facebook time) but also lifted up participants' mood and reduced their political polarization (but also their political knowledge as Facebook is a key source of political news and information); the second explores the effects of taking a month off from email as well (hint: most of your emails are not as important as you think they are!); and the last explores the idea of doing a "digital declutter" and that it's not enough to just try to take a break from social media, and instead we have to rethink the kind of digitally-minimalist lifestyle we really want to live (or not).

Enjoy the "light" reading!

Kitces & Carl Ep 01: How To Value The Value Of Financial Planning

January 31, 2019 12:01 pm 1 Comment CATEGORY: Kitces & Carl Podcast Planning Profession

One of the biggest challenges comprehensive financial planners face today is that “everyone” says they do financial planning. Yet in practice, what they actually do, whether it’s really comprehensive financial planning, or even what constitutes “financial planning” as opposed to just ad hoc financial advice, has no clear and consistent definition within the industry. And if we can’t figure out what the differences are within the industry, then it’s almost impossible for the public to understand the differences between the services offered (including any potential conflicts) by a whole bunch of people who do different stuff (frequently playing by different sets of rules) yet say they all do the same thing! Not to mention trying to help the public understand the value (both financially tangible and intangible) of the financial planning choices available and being offered to them.

To explore this issue, we’re introducing you to a new experimental (but possibly recurring if you like it!) content format we’re simply calling “Kitces & Carl” here at The Nerd’s Eye View, where Michael Kitces and financial advisor communication guru Carl Richards sit down to discuss industry topics from their own unique perspectives. And in this inaugural episode, Michael and Carl talk about the Value of Financial Advice, efforts to quantify that value, and why we may need to move past the asset-based model in order to define and communicate the real value of financial planning to our clients and the public in general.

Fortunately, both Morningstar, Vanguard, and Envestnet have done some research to try and quantify an answer to this very question. Their studies suggest that, even when we ignore any potential excess investment return, the advice that advisors provide around the dollars that they are managing can amount to an additional 1.5-3.0% over what a client would have likely gotten had they “done it themselves”

But, outside of “helping clients avoid big mistakes” by re-allocating their portfolios or talking them off the proverbial “ledge” when volatility ticks up, there’s arguably another aspect to helping clients that transcends the “quantifiable” aspect of the profession. Because most clients don’t have anywhere else they can go and feel safe talking about this topic of money, that is so important yet remains a taboo topic of discussion, and for many carries an enormous amount of baggage. And those hurdles only expand geometrically when it’s a couple that’s sitting across the desk.

In fact, perhaps the greatest problem of trying to explain the value of financial advice, especially while the industry is in the midst of such rapid change, is that we are still tying all our value conversations back to the portfolio-based model... to the extent that, even when trying to quantify the behavioral aspects of planning, industry studies still scale them to a percentage of assets. Even though an increasingly amount of the value of financial planning advice is specifically about the advice that occurs outside of the portfolio!

Alternatively, perhaps instead of trying to put a dollar value on the advice we provide as advisors at all, we might just consider framing it in terms of the real-world outcomes for clients. For instance, what if we as advisors simply said to a couple having stressful arguments about money that, “We help couples have better conversations about money, so they’re not as awkward”? And then let them figure out if it’s valuable enough to them to pay for it? Because, if an advisor can help reduce marital stress and reduce the number of marriages that end out in divorce because of money issues… then clients might consider that a whole lot more valuable that we might have ever imagined anyway!

Ultimately, then, the key point is to recognize that as financial planning continues to expand beyond just building and managing diversified asset allocated portfolios, the key task as an industry is to figure out how we can frame that value beyond the context of “investable assets”. Because if we want to better communicate our value to prospects and clients, especially beyond the portfolio, we must first be willing to fully embrace and acknowledge that value ourselves.