After years of wavering, the Financial Planning Association has recently re-focused itself back to specifically supporting financial planners who pursue the CFP certification and advocating for the CFP to be recognized as the one true designation, recalling back the famous "One Profession, One Designation" refrain first uttered by financial planning luminary P. Kemp Fain nearly 25 years ago. Yet the reality is that while the CFP certification has advanced significantly since Fain's first comments in 1987, so too have many "competing" designations, some of which represent very high quality advanced educational content, albeit often in narrow and focused specialties under the financial planning umbrella. Nonetheless, many "bogus" designations have also proliferated over the years, contributing significantly to consumer confusion. As a result, while there is still virtue to having the CFP certification as a minimum baseline designation to cut out the other bogus designations, there needs to be room for the advanced specializations that have begun to emerge as well. Which means perhaps it's time for the FPA to extend Fain's famous speech one step further, from "One Profession, One Designation" to "One Profession, One [Minimum] Designation" - where the CFP certification serves as a minimum baseline for anyone who wishes to become a financial planner, but beyond which a growing number of "post-CFP" educational programs can flourish to support the emerging fields of financial planner specialization.Read More...
Enjoy the current installment of "weekend reading for financial planners" - this week's edition starts off with a discussion by compliance consultant Brian Hamburger, suggesting that while the investment adviser world seems to prefer SEC user fees to FINRA as a regulator, it may be better to step back and ask more basic questions about what effective enforcement and the role of regulation should really be in the first place. From there, we look at an array of practice management articles this week, including a discussion of how to protect your firm from fraud, how to better engage clients (and generate more referrals as a result), how to get past the growth wall once you hit it, the problems with micro-managing staff instead of empowering them and getting out of their way, and a look at a new tool to benchmark the compensation of advisors and staff. We also look at a few more technical articles, including a research paper on how to evaluate non-qualified stock option decisions, how to incorporate interior finance issues into your practice and work with clients, and a look and what "endogenous risk" means and how it impacts portfolios. We wrap up with two interesting articles; the first provides a good warning about how advisors can better navigate copyright laws when writing material for their blog or website, and the other is a lighter article on "10 Things Happy People Do Differently" which may not provide any great revelations but may provide some nice reminders for a few of you. Enjoy the reading!
As the long-term care insurance industry continues to suffer - a challenge that won't likely end soon, given ongoing increases in health care costs and continued low interest rates that may it difficult for the insurer to generate a return on premium investments - planners and clients have both become increasingly skeptical about long-term care insurance. At best, prospective policyowners feel compelled to buy far less coverage than they can afford, just to leave room in case premiums rise in the future, given the quantity of ugly premium increases on existing policies that have occurred in recent years. Yet the reality is that while many industry trends, from low lapse rates to low interest rates to claims patterns were a surprise relative to what insurance companies expected 10-15 years ago, they are known facts today. Accordingly, even the base cost for a new long-term care insurance policy has risen dramatically over the past decade. However, higher pricing - adjusted for the realities of today's marketplace - actually means that while the pace and severity of premium increases on old policies has risen, the risk of premium increases on new policies purchased today may actually be declining! Are planners and their clients becoming most concerned about long-term care insurance premiums at the time they are actually least likely to occur!?
As the public becomes more savvy about protecting themselves from fraud – in part due to the assistance of increasingly sophisticated anti-virus and anti-phishing software – thieves are becoming more and more creative about new ways to steal. A disturbing new trend is that some thieves are beginning to directly target financial advisors and their clients – as famous bank robber Willie Sutton noted, if you want to get rich by stealing, go to where the money is! Accordingly, financial advisors and investment custodians have seen a noticeable increase in attempts at fraudulent wire transfers by "spoofing" – where a request sent “from the client” is actually a spoof from a fake-but-similar email account (or sometimes is even the client’s actual account!), and asks the advisor to process a wire transfer to a third party bank account. By the time anyone realizes the request was fake, the money is already gone, the transfer cannot be unwound, and the wire fraud theft is complete. In response, it’s crucial for advisors to review – and potentially change and improve – their processes and procedures to ensure a wire transfer request is legitimate before acting upon it, especially in scenarios where the transfer is going to a third party. Fortunately, some best practices are emerging about how to avoid these kinds of client disasters!
Enjoy the current installment of "weekend reading for financial planners" - this week's edition starts off with an interesting analysis of fiduciary history and the CFP Board's current fiduciary rules for CFP certificants, suggesting that the CFP Board still has a little ways left to go to reach a truly all-encompassing fiduciary standard. From there, we look at an interview in the Journal of Financial Planning with Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman, an exploration by financial planner and researcher Jon Guyton about how the safe withdrawal rate research is holding up for a year 2000 retiree, a study by David Blanchett on the use of variable annuity GMWB riders to support retirement income, a recent study by Harold Evensky (and co-author Shaun Pfeiffer) indicating that active managers may do better in bear markets than bull markets but not by enough to generate consistent alpha over a full market cycle, and a discussion by professor Michael Finke of Texas Tech that the recent Bill Gross article about the "dying cult of equities" may have some validity. There are also a few consumer investment pieces that may be of interest to planners, including a discussion of what "tactical" really means, and some things to watch out for with the recent trend towards managed ETF strategies, along with two strong technical articles, one about new tax planning issues and opportunities tied to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the other about how to counsel clients through a short sale or other underwater-mortgage alternatives. We wrap up with an interesting research article suggesting that it's almost impossible for us to convey that we're "warm" and "competent" at the same time - instead, the constraints of our language force us to lean in one direction in how we're perceived, at the direct cost of the other. Enjoy the reading!
As the end of 2012 approaches, so too does the end of our current gift and estate tax exemptions and rates - with the so-called "fiscal cliff" the estate tax exemption is scheduled to fall precipitously in 2013, while the maximum estate tax rate rises. As a result, many high net worth clients have been encouraged to consider gifting away significant sums of money this year - to take advantage of the current exemption - before it lapses. And as with most gifting strategies, often the least effective means is to simply gift cash; instead, popular strategies include using a Family Limited Partnership (FLP) to obtain a valuation discount for the assets being gifted, or alternatively to gift the money to an Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (IDGT) and use it as seed money to buy even more assets out of the estate. Unfortunately, though, there are many important caveats, including the risk of an estate tax clawback, the affordability of the gift itself, and coordination with state estate tax laws. Nonetheless, with the estate tax exemption amount scheduled to drop more than 80% in just a few months, the pressure is on for many clients to make a decision about whether they will engage in an end-of-year gifting strategy or not - or at least, prepare so that they can complete such a gift once the outcome of the election is known!Read More...
